Sunday, December 28, 2008
Pakistan-India War? By Accident, Maybe
read more | digg story
Friday, December 26, 2008
US warning on South Asia tension
Pakistan has redeployed some troops from the north-west and some leave has been cancelled, army officials said.
India earlier advised its citizens against travelling to Pakistan amid the continuing tension in the
read more | digg story
Pakistan Moves Troops Near Border as India Tensions Rise.
The United States urged both sides to refrain from further raising tensions, already high after India blamed Islamist militants based in Pakistan for attacks on Mumbai last month that killed 179 people.
The latest strains followed media reports in Pakistan and India that "several" Indian nationals had been held in the last two days after bombings in the Pakistani cities of Lahore and Multan.
The foreign ministry in New Delhi warned Indian citizens on Friday that "it would be unsafe for them to travel (to) or be in Pakistan."
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had earlier discussed tension with Pakistan during a scheduled meeting about military pay with the chiefs of the army, navy and air force, his office said.
read more digg story
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Arrest how many terrorists?
read more digg story
Pakistan: We're ready for war with India
A peace vigil in honour of those who died in the Mumbai attacks is held in the Indian city of Bhopal...
This is really scary. Actually, it's all just getting more and more frightening. Meaning the violence, insanity and depravity that has completely taken over the entire world.
Pakistan warned it is ready for war with India if it is attacked following the strike by the Mumbai terrorists.
The remarks by Pakistan's foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who also insisted he would not hand over any suspects in the Mumbai attacks, come amid mounting tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
India has said it is keeping all options open following last month's carnage by the Mumbai terrorists, who killed more than 170 people.
"We do not want to impose war, but we are fully prepared in case war is imposed on us," said Mr Qureshi.
"We are not oblivious to our responsibilities to defend our homeland. But it is our desire that there should be no war."
read more digg story
Monday, December 8, 2008
Pakistan Arrests Suspect in Mumbai Attacks
In the first hours after news of the raid emerged on Pakistani television and in news agencies, a senior Pakistani security official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that a man suspected of being the mastermind of the Mumbai attacks had been arrested. But the same official later said that even though about a dozen people had been arrested in the raid at the camp, the suspect, Zaki ur-Rehman Lakhvi, had not been arrested. The Pakistani military acknowledged that the raid had taken place, saying in a statement that an operation was under way against a “banned” militant organization, and that there had been a number of arrests. The operation appeared to be Pakistan’s first concrete response to demands by India and the United States that it take action against the militants suspected of orchestrating the Mumbai attacks.
read more digg story
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Clinton vs Gates on Pakistan
read more | digg story
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Might Hoax Call Have Triggered A War?
"Whether it was mere mischief or a sinister move by someone in the Indian external affairs ministry, or the call came from within Pakistan, remains unclear, and is still a matter of investigation. But several political, diplomatic and security sources have confirmed to Dawn that for nearly 24 hours over the weekend the incident continued to send jitters across the world. To some world leaders the probability of an accidental war appeared very high."The European ambassador who spoke to CBS NEWS warned that the hoax call raises the dangerous possibility of “the failure to follow procedure and tampering of communication systems, bringing these two nuclear armed countries close to war."read more digg story
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Citizen Revolution: India comes together in Mumbai
read more digg story
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
ABC News: Explosive Devices Defused at Mumbai Train Station
read more digg story
Mumbai: Where are the 14 Other Pakistani-Trained Terrorists?
read more digg story
Alleged Mastermind of Mumbai Attacks Identified
read more digg story
Monday, December 1, 2008
Mumbai killers to be denied a muslim burial
read more | digg story
Sunday, November 30, 2008
India's home minister resigns

AP – In this July 27, 2008 file photo, Indian Home Minister Shivraj
Patil poses for photographs
read more digg story
I wonder, did he resign or was he forced out?
Friday, November 28, 2008
Hostages Found Dead In Mumbai Jewish Center
read more digg story
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Jesuits use Suffering & Fear to Grow Ecumenicalism in India

NEW DELHI (UCAN) -- The violence and suffering the Indian Church
underwent recently did not discourage it, and in fact has only strengthened it,
says the newly elected head of the Church of North India (CNI).On Oct. 20, the CNI synod, the supreme decision-making body of
the Protestant Church, elected 59-year-old Bishop Purely Lyngdoh of North East
India as its moderator, or top official, for a three-year term. His diocese
covers seven states. The united Church was formed in 1970 through the merger of
six independent Protestant Churches and denominations.
read more digg story
Mumbai Attack: India's Singh Blames Pakistan as Battle Rages
read more digg story
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Dozens of People Killed in Mumbai Attacks
read more digg story
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Diverse Coalition Launches Campaign to Stop U.S. Nuclear Deal with India
Contact: Leonor Tomero, Council for a Livable World, (202) 546-0795 ext 119, ltomero@clw.org
http://www.clw.org/r/5083/24970/
Diverse Coalition Launches Campaign to Stop U.S. Nuclear Deal with India
Arms Control Experts, Environmental Activists, Consumer Advocates, Religious Groups and Doctors Find Proposed Agreement Would Dangerously Undermine National Security, Global Stability
WASHINGTON, DC –Twenty-three organizations today launched a coalition to stop the Bush Administration’s proposed nuclear trade agreement with India. The proposed agreement would exempt that nuclear-armed nation from longstanding U.S. and international restrictions on states that do not meet global standards to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.
The Campaign for Responsibility in Nuclear Trade believes the agreement would: dangerously weaken nonproliferation efforts and embolden countries like Iran and North Korea to pursue the development of nuclear weapons; further destabilize South Asia and Pakistan in particular; and violate or weaken international and U.S. laws, including the Hyde Act, which Congress passed in 2006 to provide a framework for the bilateral U.S.-Indian nuclear cooperation agreement.
“When Congress takes a close look at the Bush Administration’s proposed agreement, it will find a dangerous, unprecedented deal,” said John Isaacs of the Council for a Livable World. “The proposal undermines over 30 years of nonproliferation policy, will increase India’s capability to produce nuclear weapons and its stockpile of nuclear weapons-material, and sends the wrong message to Pakistan during a time of crisis in that country. We feel confident that, under the Congressional microscope, the many flaws of this deal will be exposed, and it will ultimately be rejected for the sake of preserving national security and global stability.”
The U.S.-Indian bilateral nuclear cooperation agreement would allow the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology and material to India. However, it fails to hold India to the same responsible nonproliferation and disarmament rules that are required of advanced nuclear states. The deal will increase India’s nuclear weapons production capability, exacerbate a nuclear arms race in the region, undermine international non-proliferation norms, and encourage the creation of large nuclear material stockpiles. Its contribution to meeting India’s growing energy needs has been greatly exaggerated and it would create economic opportunities for foreign nuclear industries without any guarantees for U.S. businesses.
The pact must win approval from the U.S. Congress, which changed U.S. law in December 2006 to allow negotiation of the agreement, under several conditions that have not been met in the final language of the agreement. Those conditions include a new agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency for safeguarding Indian power reactors and changes to the international guidelines of the 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group, which currently restrict trade with India.
Members of the Campaign are working to educate the U.S. Congress and public about the dangers of the deal, and are working with experts and organizations in two-dozen countries to inform deliberation over the deal within Nuclear Suppliers Group and its member state governments.
The new coalition’s partners include: Council for a Livable World, Arms Control Association, Federation of American Scientists, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Washington office, United Methodist Church - General Board of Church and Society, Friends Committee on National Legislation, Institute for Religion and Public Policy, Union of Concerned Scientists, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, All Souls Nuclear Disarmament Task Force, British American Security Information Council, Women’s Action for New Directions, Americans for Democratic Action, Peace Action, Peace Action West, Arms Control Advocacy Collaborative, Beyond Nuclear, Bipartisan Security Group, Citizens for Global Solutions, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and Nuclear Information Resource Information Service.
Advisors to the coalition include Ambassador Robert Grey (Ret.), former U.S. Representative to the Conference on Disarmament and Director of the Bipartisan Security Group; Dr. Leonard Weiss, former staff director of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Energy and Nuclear Proliferation and the Committee on Governmental Affairs; Dr. Robert G. Gard, Jr., Lt. Gen., U.S. Army (Ret.), Senior Military Fellow, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation; Subrata Ghoshroy, Director, Promoting Nuclear Stability in South Asia Project, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Dr. Christopher Paine, Nuclear Program Director, Natural Resources Defense Council.
The Campaign’s website is http://www.clw.org/r/5085/24970/.
About the Campaign for Responsibility in Nuclear Trade
The Campaign for Responsibility in Nuclear Trade, a partnership project of 23 nuclear arms control, non-proliferation, environmental and consumer protection organizations, opposes the July 2005 proposal for civil nuclear cooperation with India and the additional U.S. concessions made to India as a result of subsequent negotiations because they pose far-reaching and adverse implications for U.S. and international security, global nuclear non-proliferation efforts, human life and health, and the environment. More information about the campaign can be found at http://www.clw.org/r/5087/24970/.



