Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts

Monday, October 5, 2009

Texas governor accused of covering up innocent man’s execution | Raw Story

By Daniel Tencer
Saturday, October 3rd, 2009 -- 7:02 pm

The head of a Texas anti-death penalty group has accused that state's governor of scuttling an investigation into a possible wrongful execution for political reasons.

"[Texas Governor Rick] Perry saw the writing on the wall," Scott Cobb, president of the Texas Moratorium Network, told CNN. "He moved to cover that up."

The "writing on the wall" Cobb was referring to was the investigation by the Texas Forensic Science Commission into the execution of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was put to death in 2004 for the 1991 arson deaths of his three daughters.

Forensic investigations done since Willingham's conviction have found no evidence of arson. Nonetheless, Perry refused to grant Willingham a stay of execution in 2004, even though credible questions had already been raised about Willingham's guilt.

On Wednesday, Gov. Perry ordered the removal of three members of the forensics commission, and instituted a "political ally," as CNN described him, to head the committee. That ally is reported to have ordered the investigation into Willingham's execution delayed indefinitely, saying he "couldn't begin to guess" when the commission would reconvene.

Read the rest of the story by clicking link below.

Texas governor accused of covering up innocent man’s execution | Raw Story

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Predictions of the Year 2000, from a December 1900 Ladies Home Journal

This was too interesting not to post!

The Ladies Home Journal from December 1900, which contained a fascinating article by John Elfreth Watkins, Jr. “What May Happen in the Next Hundred Years”.

Mr. Watkins wrote: “These prophecies will seem strange, almost impossible. Yet, they have come from the most learned and conservative minds in America. To the wisest and most careful men in our greatest institutions of science and learning I have gone, asking each in his turn to forecast for me what, in his opinion, will have been wrought in his own field of investigation before the dawn of 2001 - a century from now. These opinions I have carefully transcribed.”

During the Year 2000, we included Mr. Watkins research in our feature articles. We invite you to comment on these predictions, whether they have been realized in some way or how they can never be accomplished! In any event, we know you’ll enjoy these entries.

Prediction #1: There will probably be from 350,000,000 to 500,000,000 people in America and its possessions by the lapse of another century. Nicaragua will ask for admission to our Union after the completion of the great canal. Mexico will be next. Europe, seeking more territory to the south of us, will cause many of the South and Central American republics to be voted into the Union by their own people.”

Prediction #2: The American will be taller by from one to two inches. His increase of stature will result from better health, due to vast reforms in medicine, sanitation, food and athletics. He will live fifty years instead of thirty-five as at present – for he will reside in the suburbs. The city house will practically be no more. Building in blocks will be illegal. The trip from suburban home to office will require a few minutes only. A penny will pay the fare.

Prediction #3: Gymnastics will begin in the nursery, where toys and games will be designed to strengthen the muscles. Exercise will be compulsory in the schools. Every school, college and community will have a complete gymnasium. All cities will have public gymnasiums. A man or woman unable to walk ten miles at a stretch will be regarded as a weakling.

Prediction #4: There Will Be No Street Cars in Our Large Cities. All hurry traffic will be below or high above ground when brought within city limits. In most cities it will be confined to broad subways or tunnels, well lighted and well ventilated, or to high trestles with “moving-sidewalk” stairways leading to the top. These underground or overhead streets will teem with capacious automobile passenger coaches and freight with cushioned wheels. Subways or trestles will be reserved for express trains. Cities, therefore, will be free from all noises.

Prediction #5: Trains will run two miles a minute, normally; express trains one hundred and fifty miles an hour. To go from New York to San Francisco will take a day and a night by fast express. There will be cigar-shaped electric locomotives hauling long trains of cars. Cars will, like houses, be artificially cooled. Along the railroads there will be no smoke, no cinders, because coal will neither be carried nor burned. There will be no stops for water. Passengers will travel through hot or dusty country regions with windows down.

Prediction #6: Automobiles will be cheaper than horses are today. Farmers will own automobile hay-wagons, automobile truck-wagons, plows, harrows and hay-rakes. A one-pound motor in one of these vehicles will do the work of a pair of horses or more. Children will ride in automobile sleighs in winter. Automobiles will have been substituted for every horse vehicle now known. There will be, as already exist today, automobile hearses, automobile police patrols, automobile ambulances, automobile street sweepers. The horse in harness will be as scarce, if, indeed, not even scarcer, then as the yoked ox is today.

Prediction #7: There will be air-ships, but they will not successfully compete with surface cars and water vessels for passenger or freight traffic. They will be maintained as deadly war-vessels by all military nations. Some will transport men and goods. Others will be used by scientists making observations at great heights above the earth.

Prediction #8: Aerial War-Ships and Forts on Wheels. Giant guns will shoot twenty-five miles or more, and will hurl anywhere within such a radius shells exploding and destroying whole cities. Such guns will be armed by aid of compasses when used on land or sea, and telescopes when directed from great heights. Fleets of air-ships, hiding themselves with dense, smoky mists, thrown off by themselves as they move, will float over cities, fortifications, camps or fleets. They will surprise foes below by hurling upon them deadly thunderbolts. These aerial war-ships will necessitate bomb-proof forts, protected by great steel plates over their tops as well as at their sides. Huge forts on wheels will dash across open spaces at the speed of express trains of to-day. They will make what are now known as cavalry charges. Great automobile plows will dig deep entrenchments as fast as soldiers can occupy them. Rifles will use silent cartridges. Submarine boats submerged for days will be capable of wiping a whole navy off the face of the deep. Balloons and flying machines will carry telescopes of one-hundred-mile vision with camera attachments, photographing an enemy within that radius. These photographs as distinct and large as if taken from across the street, will be lowered to the commanding officer in charge of troops below.

Prediction #9: Photographs will be telegraphed from any distance. If there be a battle in China a hundred years hence snapshots of its most striking events will be published in the newspapers an hour later. Even to-day photographs are being telegraphed over short distances. Photographs will reproduce all of Nature’s colors.

Prediction #10: Man will See Around the World. Persons and things of all kinds will be brought within focus of cameras connected electrically with screens at opposite ends of circuits, thousands of miles at a span. American audiences in their theatres will view upon huge curtains before them the coronations of kings in Europe or the progress of battles in the Orient. The instrument bringing these distant scenes to the very doors of people will be connected with a giant telephone apparatus transmitting each incidental sound in its appropriate place. Thus the guns of a distant battle will be heard to boom when seen to blaze, and thus the lips of a remote actor or singer will be heard to utter words or music when seen to move.

(The list continues...)
read more digg story

Saturday, October 18, 2008

ACLU Premieres "The End Of America"

"The End of America" follows Naomi Wolf, the author of the bestselling book by the same title, as she discusses America's dangerous slide towards a society of fear and surveillance, and chronicles her work to raise awareness about the threats to democracy in the U.S. when the rule of law is not upheld. The film traces the ten steps that have...

read more | digg story

Friday, October 19, 2007

uncomfortably numb |

Here's a link to my attempt at a website. I'm under construction, right now. Actually, I'm a pack rat with too many links & graphics stuffed into my sluggish computer. So, I'm setting up this site for my ever growing list of blogs, sites, and links. You'll find alot of stuff on politics, graphics, news and feeds. Oh yeah, a lot of quotes too! Peace

read more | digg story

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Bush and his promising future?

It's funny that Bush can look forward to a future...when I had hoped he'd be concerned about serving time for war crimes that he and Cheney have committed. But, that's a fantasy with our government and our society. All this will be long forgotten and the only people to pay the price are the Troops, the people of Iraq, and the American people (unknowingly, because most Americans don't realize that the war effects them, unless they have loved one fighting in it)...all while Bush gets paid to speak? Who would want to listen to him? From:

Blue Dog Thoughts: Looking Forward to His Legacy and Some Good News from the Latest Census Figures

The New York Times reports in a September 2, 2007, article that President Bush dropped his guard recently with his biographer, author Robert Draper. Looking forward to the future, he said, "I’ll give some speeches, just to replenish the ol’ coffers.” With assets that have been estimated as high as nearly $21 million, Mr. Bush added, “I don’t know what my dad gets — it’s more than 50-75” thousand dollars a speech, and “Clinton’s making a lot of money.” According to President Bush, he wants, “To get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence,” and, he said later, “stay longer.”
Thus, President Bush likely enjoyed being able to report continued gains in security in Iraq. According to him, these gains may allow for a reduction in U.S. troops.

(Click on the source link below to read the rest of the article)

Source: Blue Dog Thoughts: Looking Forward to His Legacy and Some Good News from the Latest Census Figures

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps

There are some things common to every state that's made the transition to fascism. Author Naomi Wolf argues that all of them are present in America today.


More stories by Naomi Wolf

Editor's note: This is adapted from Wolf's forthcoming book "The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot."

Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down -- the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel and took certain activists into custody.

They were not figuring these things out as they went along. If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship. That blueprint has been used again and again in more and less bloody, more and less terrifying ways. But it is always effective. It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain a democracy, but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. You simply have to be willing to take the 10 steps.

As difficult as this is to contemplate, it is clear, if you are willing to look, that each of these 10 steps has already been initiated in the United States by the Bush administration.

Because Americans like me were born in freedom, we have a hard time even considering that it is possible for us to become as unfree, domestically, as many other nations. Because we no longer learn much about our rights or our system of government -- the task of being aware of the Constitution has been outsourced from citizens to professionals such as lawyers and professors -- we scarcely recognise the checks and balances that the founders put in place, even as they are being systematically dismantled. Because we don't learn much about European history, the setting up of a department of "homeland" security -- remember who else was keen on the word "homeland"? -- didn't raise the alarm bells it might have.

It is my argument that, beneath our very noses, George Bush and his administration are using time-tested tactics to close down an open society. It is time for us to be willing to think the unthinkable -- as the author and political journalist Joe Conason has put it -- that it can happen here. And that we are further along than we realize.

Conason eloquently warned of the danger of American authoritarianism. I am arguing that we need also to look at the lessons of European and other kinds of fascism to understand the potential seriousness of the events we see unfolding in the United States.

(Click on the source link below to read the rest of the article)

Source: AlterNet: War on Iraq: Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps

Saturday, March 17, 2007

today's quotations on Peace...


"I like to believe that people in the long run are going to do more to promote peace than our governments. Indeed, I think that people want peace so much that one of these days governments had better get out of the way and let them have it."
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890 - 1969)

"Every day we do things, we are things that have to do with peace. If we are aware of our life..., our way of looking at things, we will know how to make peace right in the moment, we are alive."
Thich Nhat Hanh

"If you want peace, stop fighting. If you want peace of mind, stop fighting with your thoughts."
Peter McWilliams, Life 101, 1991

"First keep the peace within yourself, then you can also bring peace to others."
Thomas a Kempis (1380 - 1471), 1420

"Peace is not a relationship of nations. It is a condition of mind brought about by a serenity of soul. Peace is not merely the absence of war. It is also a state of mind. Lasting peace can come only to peaceful people."
-Jawaharlal Nehru

Saturday, February 17, 2007

"Senate gridlocks on Iraq war resolution"

the government isn't listening at all... I was watching "A Huey P. Newton Story" by Roger Guenveur Smith around the time they were voting today. I highly recommend this film...especially during times like these. I know I'm justified in my anger toward the establishment. Although, I do disagree with violence as a means to evoke change...I wonder how long the American people will continue to allow their government to act in it's own best interests and not the people they are supposed to represent...

WASHINGTON - The Senate gridlocked on the Iraq war in a sharply worded showdown Saturday as Republicans foiled a Democratic bid to repudiate President Bush’s deployment of 21,500 additional combat troops.

The 56-34 vote fell four short of the 60 needed to advance a nonbinding measure identical to one the House passed Friday. Seven GOP senators broke ranks, compared with only two during an earlier test on the issue.

Democrats swiftly claimed victory. “A majority of the United States Senate is against the escalation in Iraq,” said Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. “As for the Republicans who chose once again to block further debate and protect President Bush, the American people now know they support the escalation” in troops.

Source: Senate gridlocks on Iraq war resolution - Politics - MSNBC.com

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Homeland Insecurity - American Children at Risk

Click Here to Download Free Book

"Millions of American children are without health insurance, millions are reported abused and neglected, millions are left unsupervised everyday after school, and millions have parents in a prison system that is crushing families."

To help spark debate about the need for major new federal investments in children and families, the Every Child Matters Education Fund has published a book called Homeland Insecurity… American Children at Risk. The book can be downloaded for free by clicking the image above. Our goal is to make children, youth, and family issues a political priority in the forthcoming presidential election.


On Monday the administration presented its 2008 budget. Like its proposed budgets of previous years, this one not only fails to make long-overdue new investments in proven health and social programs for children and families, it also proposes cuts in many areas.

The opinion piece below on federal budget priorities and children is drawn from an essay which appeared earlier this week in TomPaine.com.


Our Children's Homeland Insecurity
By Michael Petit
February 06, 2007

Michael Petit is president of the Every Child Matters Education Fund. He served as commissioner of Maine's Human Services Department and was deputy director of the Child Welfare League of America.


Steady progress was made for decades during the 20th century in health, education and social indicators for children thanks to long-term public support for federal spending on maternal and child health services, hospitals, medical research, higher education for doctors and nurses and other public health measures. Many of these social gains are now stalled or at risk of being reversed thanks to two myths underpinning conservative political ideology dominant since the early 1980's: first, that the federal government can't do anything right, and second, that taxes are akin to outright thievery.
This ill-conceived ideology accounts for the virtual indifference in much of official Washington toward the plight of millions of American children who are without health insurance, are abused and neglected, are left unsupervised every day after school, or whose parents are caught in a criminal justice system that is crushing families.

Proven programs and policies that could actually reduce these social ills have come under repeated attack starting in the early 1980's. Since 2001 these earlier attacks have expanded. Cuts in federal taxes and their impact on state revenues forced many cuts in child care programs, child support enforcement, health care assistance, Head Start, and more, ignoring decades of documentation showing that more, not less, federal spending on children was needed. The result is a huge investment gap, one producing much worse outcomes for U.S. children and families than found in other rich democracies.

The children harmed most by anti-tax/anti-government ideology live in the very states which have embraced it most enthusiastically. Nowhere is this more evident than in Texas, a classic low-tax, low-service state. How effective has this ideology been in Texas? Nationally, Texas ranks:


  • 1st in the percentage of uninsured children
  • 1st in food insecurity
  • 1st in child abuse deaths
  • 1st in the number of incarcerated adults
  • 2nd in the percentage of the population that goes hungry
  • 1st in teen pregnancy
  • 5th in the overall poverty rate
  • 6th in crime
  • 47th in income and food stamps benefits for the neediest
  • 50th in the percentage of fully-immunized two-year-olds


Yet the politicians whose harsh policies produce these outcomes stubbornly insist that more tax breaks and more cuts in programs are good for America's children.

In a counterpoint to compassionate conservatism, a new report by Every Child Matters Education Fund, Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk, draws from official data in 11 child-related statistical measures to rank the well-being of children in the states. It shows that the states with the best outcomes for children generally tax themselves at higher rates and make more investments in programs serving children. In these states, more children are insured and enrolled in after-school programs, and they are more likely to be aided if abused. The states with the worst outcomes generally keep taxes lower but at the expense of children and other vulnerable groups who would benefit from publicly financed health and social programs.

Do we know how to reduce child poverty and the other social ills afflicting millions of children and families? We do. The Great Society initiatives of the mid-1960's, for example, helped knock back child poverty to a record-low 14 percent by 1969.

Conservative ideologues have taken pains to misrepresent the effectiveness of government poverty programs, loudly proclaiming that only the private sector could help the poor while ignoring evidence that the much lower child poverty rates in other countries are the direct result of public, not private, policies. Most telling, government data show that since the latest round of conservative tax and budget dogma was imposed in 2001, household income has dropped, poverty has increased and health coverage has declined.

If we are going to invest in children's programs, we have to pay for them. Earlier generations of Americans understood that progressive taxes are essential to democracy and its commitment to equal opportunity for all children. The current generation of anti-tax conservatives seems determined to prove our ancestors wrong.

Our children deserve much better.

To see the ranking of states on child well-being, or to download a copy of Homeland Insecurity, visit http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=282352813&url_num=7&url=http://www.everychildmatters.org/.


Source: Homeland Insecurity - American Children at Risk


Thursday, February 8, 2007

How can you cover the news if you don't cover the world...

It is ironic in this era of globalization, as international affairs rise to the top of the agenda, that some media companies are forsaking the responsibility to inform readers, listeners, and viewers of what is happening in the world, and analyze what it means.

Faced with declining circulation, rising costs, and competition from the Web, some large newspapers are closing foreign bureaus and slashing budgets for travel. Recently, The Boston Globe announced that it would close its last three foreign bureaus - in Berlin, Bogotá, and Jerusalem - after three decades of reporting from staff members based overseas.

The Baltimore Sun is closing its bureaus in South Africa and Russia after closing its bureaus in Britain and China earlier.

In the television news field, CNN is maintaining its position abroad, but the other major networks have long since been closing foreign bureaus and withdrawing resident correspondents. Instead, they resort to "parachute journalism," which means dispatching US-based reporters for short spells abroad when important news breaks. The downside of this is that the reporters parachuted in do not have the background, sources, or cultural sensitivities of correspondents who would have been stationed in their respective areas of coverage for extended periods.

All this disturbs columnist and editorial page editor Fred Hiatt, who laments in his newspaper, The Washington Post, what he fears may be the "vanishing foreign correspondent." Formerly stationed in Tokyo, he recognizes that wire reporters from the Associated Press and elsewhere do noble work but says that they generally cannot provide the variety of reporting, analysis, and interpretation beyond the wire services' menu.

After 9/11, writes Mr. Hiatt, there was nearly universal acknowledgment that Americans would be better off if they knew more about the world. But a survey by Monitor correspondent Jill Carroll, studying foreign news coverage at Harvard's Shorenstein Center, found that the number of US newspaper foreign correspondents declined from 188 in 2002 to 141 last year.

(more... )

Source: US media can't cover the news if they don't cover the world - Yahoo! News

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, February 1, 2007

United States v. George W. Bush et al.

United States v. George W. Bush et al.
from Tomdispatch.com
in association with Seven Stories Press




“U.S. v. Bush et al. is much more powerful than The 9-11 Commission Report. A tour de force.”

CHALMERS JOHNSON

Description

What if there were a fraud worse than Enron and no one did anything about it?

In United States v. George W. Bush et. al., former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega brings her twenty years of experience and her passion for justice to the most important case of her career. The defendants are George W Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, and Colin Powell. The crime is tricking the nation into war, or, in legal terms, conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Ms. de la Vega has reviewed the evidence, researched the law, drafted an indictment, and in this lively, accessible book, presented it to a grand jury. If the indictment and grand jury are both hypothetical, the facts are tragically real: Over half of all Americans believe the President misled the country into a war that has left 2,500 hundred American soldiers and countless Iraqis dead. The cost is $350 billion -- and counting.

The legal question is: Did the president and his team use the same techniques as those used by Enron’s Ken Lay, Jeffrey Skilling, and fraudsters everywhere -- false pretenses, half-truths, deliberate omissions -- in order to deceive Congress and the American public?

Take advantage of this rare opportunity to “sit” with the grand jurors as de la Vega presents a case of prewar fraud that should persuade any fair-minded person who loves this country as much as she so obviously does. Faced with an ongoing crime of such magnitude, she argues, we can not simply shrug our shoulders and walk away.

more...

Source: United States v. George W. Bush et al. - from Tomdispatch.com in association with Seven Stories Press, Seven Stories Press

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

The Last Question

by

Isaac Asimov

This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written.

After all, I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I succeeded. I also undertook another task, but I won't tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you.

It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story. They seem never to remember the title of the story or (for sure) the author, except for the vague thought it might be me. But, of course, they never forget the story itself especially the ending. The idea seems to drown out everything -- and I'm satisfied that it should.

continued...

Source: The Last Question