Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Cindy Sheehan is Quitting the Democratic Party and the Peace Movement...

Cindy Sheehan is mad as hell and can't take it anymore.  I don't blame her.  It's hard to stand up for what is right only to get lambasted by just about everyone and become the laughing stock of the conservative media and their pundits.

I am going to take whatever I have left and go home. I am going to go home and be a mother to my surviving children and try to regain some of what I have lost. I will try to maintain and nurture some very positive relationships that I have found in the journey that I was forced into when Casey died and try to repair some of the ones that have fallen apart since I began this single-minded crusade to try and change a paradigm that is now, I am afraid, carved in immovable, unbendable and rigidly mendacious marble.

Camp Casey has served its purpose. It’s for sale. Anyone want to buy five beautiful acres in Crawford, Texas? I will consider any reasonable offer. I hear George Bush will be moving out soon, too…which makes the property even more valuable.

This is my resignation letter as the “face” of the American anti-war movement. This is not my “Checkers” moment, because I will never give up trying to help people in the world who are harmed by the empire of the good old US of A, but I am finished working in, or outside of this system. This system forcefully resists being helped and eats up the people who try to help it. I am getting out before it totally consumes me or anymore people that I love and the rest of my resources.

Good-bye America…you are not the country that I love and I finally realized no matter how much I sacrifice, I can’t make you be that country unless you want it.

It’s up to you now.

Source: Good Riddance Attention Whore | AfterDowningStreet.org

 

Ann Telnaes on gas and war...




Ann Telnaes by Ann Telnaes


Ann Telnaes’ editorial cartoons have appeared in such prestigious publications as The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Newsday, The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun and USA Today.


Source: Ann Telnaes, comics, editorial cartoons, email comics, political cartoons



Monday, May 28, 2007

"Dems' bizarre assault on Hugo Chavez"

 

Posted by Guest Blogger at 7:17 AM on May 28, 2007.

Robert Naiman: A simple question: would it be an issue if the U.S. did it?

This post, by Robert Naiman, originally appeared on the Blog for a Just Foreign Policy.

While many people were gnashing their teeth over the Congressional decision to fund the escalation of the war in Iraq without any meaningful restriction, the Senate, led by Senators Dodd, Clinton, and Obama, did something very bizarre. It passed a resolution introduced by Dodd and Lugar denouncing Venezuela for not renewing the license of a TV station that actively supported the 2002 military coup against the democratically elected government.

(Continued...)

Source: AlterNet: Blogs: PEEK: Dems' bizarre assault on Hugo Chavez

 

A very profitable war

 

From "Iraq for Sale"

 

Why does the war in Iraq go on and on?
One reason is that it is immensely profitable for the Bush family and its friends.
These four minutes from the documentary "Iraq for Sale" were specifically banned by from being shown during a Congressional hearing by concerted action from Republican politicians.

Source: A very profitable war

 

Iraq Veterans Memorial [VIDEO]

 

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 7:31 AM on March 19, 2007.

The stories of the people that are "the cost" of the war...

For more, see Tara Lohan's excellent story HERE.

 

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.

Source: AlterNet: Blogs: Video: Iraq Veterans Memorial [VIDEO]

 

"A Veteran Speaks of the Forgotten Wounded of Iraq"

 

A Veteran Speaks of the Forgotten Wounded of Iraq
Ron Kovic, Truthdig. May 28, 2007.
A Vietnam veteran, paralyzed in the war, talks about his own struggles, those that the recently wounded in Iraq face, and how we can break this cycle of violence and begin to move in a different direction.

Source: AlterNet: Tags: veterans

 

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Sunday, May 27, 2007

"Can You Believe This War Is Still Going On?" by Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted May 26, 2007.

After committing troops to a war that has left hundreds of thousands dead and millions without homes, George W. Bush says he prays for safety and peace. Way to go, Georgie, shift the responsibility for your mess to God.

* 3,300 American troops and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are dead.

* Rumsfeld said the Iraq attack would cost $50 billion. The tab so far exceeds $500 billion.

* Almost two million Iraqis have fled the country and only 30% of kids can go to school.

On Easter Morning, George W. made another of his periodic shows of Standing With The Troops. He attended church services in the chapel at Fort Hood in Kileen, Texas, after which he offered to the assembled media this pious little announcement: "I had a chance to reflect on the great sacrifice that our military and their families are making. I prayed for their safety. I prayed for their strength and comfort. And I pray for peace."

He prayed for our troops' safety? How clueless is he? George, you have the troops stuck in another country's vicious civil war. They're under attack from every direction by every faction, every hour of every day, hit by car bombs, roadside bombs, chlorine bombs, IEDs, suicide bombs, rocket fire, mortar rounds, snipers, and assassins. There is no safety in Iraq.

He prayed for peace? George, YOU made this war. Don't put it on God! The ONLY reason that America is in Iraq is because you, "Buckshot" Cheney, Rummy, and the rest rode us into an invasion and occupation on a pack of lies.

God didn't do this, YOU did. Praying won't get it done. God helps those who help themselves. You have peace in your own hands.

Yet the war goes on...

Source: AlterNet: War on Iraq: Can You Believe This War Is Still Going On?

 

Skin tested on whales lost in river...

I keep thinking of a Star Trek movie entitled,"Star Trek IV - The Voyage Home".  If you've seen the movie then the significance of the whales at this point in time seems eerily prophetic?  I don't understand why they don't capture the whales, give them medical attention and then free them? 

Link to Skin tested on whales lost in river - USATODAY.com

 

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

"Terrorism not focus of Homeland Security?"

Does it shock you that terrorism isn't the focus of the Department of Homeland Security?  If you're like me it doesn't.  Every part of our government is broken.  I realize this.  The thing I wish I knew was how to fix it.  Everything that we as a people have tried to do to stop the decline of our government doesn't seem to be working at all.  It doesn't shock me that our government is deceitful to We the People of the United States of America...our government isn't ours anymore..."our government" now belongs to wealthy foreign interests that control "our president" ...

Of the 814,073 people charged by DHS in immigration courts during the past three years, 12 faced charges of terrorism, TRAC said.

Those 12 cases represent 0.0015 percent of the total number of cases filed.

Source: Group: Terrorism not focus of Homeland Security - CNN.com

 

Quotation about war...

 

"Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."
(Mao Zedong (1893-1976), Chinese founder of the People's Republic of China. Lecture, May 1938. "On Protracted War," Selected Works, vol. 2 (1965).)
More quotations from: Mao Zedong

Source: Quotations on / about war

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

Saturday, May 26, 2007

A quote from Maya Angelou...

 

We allow our ignorance to prevail upon us and make us think we can survive alone, alone in patches, alone in groups, alone in races, even alone in genders.
(Maya Angelou (b. 1928), U.S. author. Address, March 1990, Centenary College of Louisiana. New York Times (March 11, 1990).)
More quotations from: Maya Angelou

Source: Quotations on / about alone

 

Technorati tags: , ,

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Removal - Wednesday, May 24, 2007

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Removal by Mark Fiore

5/24/07

Mark Fiore is a San Francisco cartoonist and animator whose work also appears in the Washington Post, L.A. Times and other publications.

Source: Removal - Wednesday, May 24, 2007

 

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

FDA says gay men still can’t donate blood!

This is unfair and discriminatory...there's a poll about this issue at MSNBC.com..."Do You Think Gay Men Should Be Allowed to Donate Blood?"

 

WASHINGTON - Gay men remain banned for life from donating blood, the government said Wednesday, leaving in place — for now — a 1983 prohibition meant to prevent the spread of HIV through transfusions.

The Food and Drug Administration reiterated its long-standing policy on its Web site Wednesday, more than a year after the Red Cross and two other blood groups criticized the policy as “medically and scientifically unwarranted.”

Source: FDA says gay men still can’t donate blood - AIDS - MSNBC.com

 

Monday, May 21, 2007

From: Act Now to Stop War & End Racism (ANSWER): "Turn Up the Heat in 2007"

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

 

On March 17, tens of thousands of people marched on the Pentagon. Between March 17-20, more than 1,000 protests took place in cities and towns throughout the country. 

The people of the country want the criminal war to end immediately. Instead the death toll grows higher every day. Politicians fiddle and jockey for electoral advantage while tens of thousands of troops get sent once again, and for extended 15 month tours, to kill and be killed. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are dead as a result of this war, supported and funded by Bush and Congress.

Iraq is Bush's Vietnam War. A war based on lies enters its fifth year with no end in sight. 

Bush and the Generals hang on to the fantasy of military victory. Congress voted to prolong the war for at least another year. If the war is not worth fighting after 2008, then why should one more soldier or marine be sent to kill or die in Iraq in 2007?
The U.S. invasion and occupation has plunged Iraqi society into a terrible nightmare. We, the people, must act now, to stop this criminal enterprise. The people, not the politicians, ended the Vietnam War. We must ignite a firestorm of grassroots antiwar activity.

Starting in 1968, shortly after the historic October 1967 March on the Pentagon, the people of this country became a major factor in the calculations of the warmakers. Protest and resistance grew in every community, in every school, and inside the military as tens of thousands of soldiers, marines and vets became leaders in the anti-war movement.

Starting then it was impossible for any government leader, Pentagon spokesperson or pro-war member of Congress to visit any community or school in the country without the knowledge that they would be confronted by angry anti-war demonstrators. No military recruiter could dare come on any campus without having the knowledge that their pro-war lies would be challenged openly.

We are proposing to tens of thousands of anti-war activists and organizers around the country that we all join together and guarantee that wherever and whenever Bush, Cheney, other government officials and pro-war members of Congress step out in public they will know with certainty that they will be met by anti-war protestors. Many committed anti-war activists have been making it their business to confront the warmakers when they come to their towns. This must become a deepened, dedicated and concerted action of the anti-war movement as a whole.

This is the essence of the new nation-wide campaign called "Turn up the Heat in 2007." The campaign is very simple. ANSWER and other national anti-war coalitions, soldiers and veterans organizations, soldiers' families, Arab-American and Muslim organizations, other faith-based organizations, and student and youth groups work together to promote, publicize and mobilize for every local and regional action that confronts the war makers and their spokespersons whenever they appear in public.

This campaign starts now.

On May 23, 2007 George W. Bush will be speaking at the Coast Guard Graduation Ceremony in New London, CT. Anti-war protestors and supporters of the Impeach Bush movement will be traveling from throughout New England and New York to stage a major protest right at the site on May 23. The national and international media will be there and so will we.

Please make an urgently needed donation today

Newspaper ads publicizing the May 23 demonstration against Bush in New London, CT will be another way that we going to spread the word. Newspaper ads are an effective way of reaching hundreds of thousands of people. If you would like to make a contribution to help pay for an upcoming newspaper ad please click this link.

The ANSWER Coalition is organizing buses and car transportation to take people to the demonstration from throughout the region. Many other organizations throughout New England are co-sponsoring the protest, including Cape Cod and Island Peace Communities;Colombia Action -CT;CT Coalition for Peace/New Haven;Danbury Peace Coalition; Efficacy;Kennebunk PEACE Department;National Lawyers Guild -CT;Veterans for Peace -Ridgefield;People of Faith CT;Queers Without Borders;Unidad Latina en Acción.

Please make a donation now to help us pay for the cost of bus and van rentals, printing tens of thousands of leaflets, placards and banners. To make a tax-deductible donation or learn how to send a check, click this link

Three days later, on May 26, there will be another demonstration at West Point, New York where Dick Cheney will be the keynote speaker at another graduation ceremony. Activists are assembling at Veteran's Park in nearby Highland falls at 8:30 a.m. for a march to the Thayer Gate into West Point. The ANSWER Coalition will be mobilizing regionally for this demonstration as well.

Bush, Cheney and every other pro-war politician -- which means anyone who is for prolonging the Iraq war -- will feel the pressure of the Turn Up the Heat campaign in the weeks and months to come.

The Turn Up the Heat campaign will promote and publicize the work of all those engaged in street protests, rallies, vigils, counter-recruitment events, support for GI resisters, actions supporting veterans, impeachment rallies, petition campaigns, legal actions and political campaigns to defend civil liberties and civil rights, national efforts to oppose racial and religious profiling, and every other action that contributes to changing the political climate in this country. The power to end the war is in the people but we must step up the pressure from every direction. 

If you or your organization would like to be listed as a sponsor of the Turn up the Heat campaign, click to fill out the endorsement form.

Please donate today

Newspaper ads publicizing the May 23 demonstration against Bush in New London, CT will be another way that we going to spread the word. Newspaper ads are an effective way of reaching hundreds of thousands of people. If you would like to make a contribution to help pay for an upcoming newspaper ad please click this link.

Let's unite and support all anti-war actions in 2007. Together we will Turn up the Heat. Together we will end this war.

Source: Act Now to Stop War & End Racism (ANSWER): Turn Up the Heat in 2007

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

All I've been dying to blog about Jerry Falwell and was too afraid to admit it...

The first thing that popped into my mind when I heard about Jerry Falwell's passing was, "ding-dong the witch is dead, the witch is dead."  Then I felt horrible...then I felt sad for his family...but, then I felt exactly how this blogger felt.  I too realized that if I had died he would probably have spit on my grave because I am a married gay woman...because I'm a liberal...and, possibly because I thought he was crazy when he said the Teletubbies were gay amongst other things...

What really freak me out was this show on one of the news networks where Falwell was showing the reporter the room were he blesses presidents!!!  Jerry Falwell was a very mean, and in my opinion a mentally ill man.  I wonder if Falwell counselled Bush?  No wonder we're in the mess we're in!  I bet poor George is the saddest one of all...

This blog first appeared on the Huffington Post

Jerry Falwell hasn’t been dead for more than a few hours. Yet, I’ve been inundated by emails and text messages touting the news. I’ve got mixed feelings on how to perceive the death of someone who would probably have celebrated my own death. So, I’ve decided to call a spade a spade, even in death.

He was a hateful person who did not serve to inspire the better nature of America. Instead, he used religion to propagate hate and discrimination for as long we anyone can remember. Forgive me if I don’t cry.

The Carpetbagger Report has a compilation of Jerry Falwell’s most famous digressions from morality, ethics, and the law. Here is a classic from 2001: Falwell blames Americans for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. “The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the Pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say, ‘You helped this happen.’”

I remember, in the wake of great tragedy, Falwell making this statement. I’m happy to call attention to it today so people who give commentary on his life see that it was filled with hate. Forgive me if I don’t cry.

Howie Klein, at Down With Tyranny goes a little farther than I would, but shows he is well versed in literature. Howie’s post actually reminds me of the book “The Dante Club” by Matthew Pearl. You can read about it here. If you’re already familiar with the book, then you’ll know that a “man of God” who does not follow the spirit of the Word is reserved a particularly painful punishment in Dante’s Inferno. Forgive me if I don’t cry.

American for Separation of Church and State show how Falwell illegally transferred money from tax exempt institutions to pay for partisan political activities. This was $6.7 million dollars that regular people gave to him for his Ministry. Instead, he transferred it to political committees. He showed no regard for the law or the spirit in which that money was given. Forgive me if I don’t cry.

So, he hated women, blacks, gays, jews, liberals, progressives, atheists, agnostics, foreigners, and anybody else who disagreed with him. He broke the law. He established a university that institutionalized everything he was about. I hope it all goes with him. The brand of conservative hate he represented has no place in what this country should stand for. Forgive me if I don’t cry.

Source: AlterNet: Blogs: PEEK: No Tears For Falwell

 

Tell Congress to Pass Feingold-Reid, Vote Down the Iraq Supplemental

TELL CONGRESS TO PASS FEINGOLD-REID, VOTE DOWN THE IRAQ SUPPLEMENTAL
You can call toll free at 800-828-0498, 800-459-1887 or 800-614-2803 and ask for your own Senators.
ACTION PAGE: http://www.millionphonemarch.com/no_iraq_supplemental.php
The new Gallup Poll just came out, and lo and behold, as unpopular as still sinking president Bush is, Congress now has a LOWER approval rating.  There is a simple and complete explanation for this.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DESPISE COWARDS MORE EVEN THAN A CRIMINAL
We put Democrats in control of Congress in November on the possibly vain hope that the yellow stripes down their backs were not permanent tattoos (not that the Republicans are any better on this score).  But instead of biting the bullet, and getting our troops the hell out of the monstrously illegal occupation of Iraq, all we are getting from both sides of the aisle are tweaking "limp along with the failure" proposals.
One presidential aspirant was quoted this week as saying we are 16 votes away from ending this brutal insanity.  What a dismal abdication of leadership!  They have the votes RIGHT NOW to stop the funding, period.  Hell, they could have a 100-0 majority and they STILL wouldn't do it on their own, for fear of losing even one seat of that 100, for fear of being called insufficiently patriotically blood-thirsty.
It only takes 41 votes to filibuster the supplemental appropriation.  What would that do?  That would EXTEND debate UNTIL amendments were passed to put an END to their abortion of a foreign policy immediately.  If they had any courage whatsoever.  If they weren't so entirely tone deaf to the will of the American people more politely expressed.
Maybe they need to start hearing from more people calling them out for being such gutless cowards, which is what they are.  Cowards on bringing out troops home.  Cowards on impeachment.  Cowards, cowards and more cowards!
You may or may not get this message in time to call about the Feingold-Reid Bill SB 1007, which if the truth were known is just a half-hearted sop to the anti-occupation majority of the American people, which the "leadership" is not even sincerely pushing, and even if it were to pass it would just be vetoed.  But call anyway.  Call their bluff.  Demand they actually pass the bill, and not just use it as a "look we tried and this is why you need to elect more Democrats" campaign photo-op.
And while you are at it, tell them to vote DOWN the supplemental next week.  NO supplemental.  Not a penny more to finance the deaths of our troops in Iraq, who don't have the luxury of hiding in Congressional cloakrooms pretending there is nothing really effective they can do to stop the senseless murder and destruction.
Please take action NOW, so we can win all victories that are supposed to be ours, and forward this message to everyone else you know.
If you would like to get alerts like these, you can do so at http://www.millionphonemarch.com/in.htm

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

Bill Moyers | The Cost of War

Bill Moyers Journal

Friday 11 May 2007

    TRANSCRIPT:

    Finally, at the beginning of its fifth year, let's take a look at the cost of this war.

Bob Woodruff (ABC): "It was an impressive sight from the deck of the Abraham Lincoln, this war time president soaring overhead."

Cynthia Bowers (CBS): "The White House has sent a clear signal. It is pulling out all the stops, choreographing this finale to the War."

Bill Moyers: Yes, the war was over, the winner was George W. Bush, hailed by the press as a conquering hero.

Chris Matthews (Hardball): "He won the war, he was an effective commander, everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics."

Lou Dobbs (CNN): "He looked like alternately Commander in Chief, rock star, movie star and one of the guys."

Tom Brokaw (NBC): "Here, now, is the President of the United States as he walks across the deck with 2000 sailors and officers on board for his address to the nation on the recently completed war in Iraq."

President George W. Bush: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed."

Bill Moyers: By this point - 140 U.S. troops had died during the mission.

    But back in Iraq, reality was writing the script.

    Every day since that choreographed victory lap, violent act has followed violent act.

    This April was the cruelest month of the year. The deadliest so far.

    Even the supposedly protected heart of American power in Baghdad, The Green Zone, was shattered by an al Qaeda attack. Al Qaeda was not a presence in Iraq before the mission but it has a firm foothold there now.

    Entering its fifth year, the war's costs are soaring so fast the Web site costofwar.com uses a non-stop digital counter to keep up with the spending. In today's dollars, it's projected to become the most expensive war in recent history - reaching nearly one-trillion dollars.

    According to the National Priorities Project, the money spent on the war so far could have provided America:

  • 1.8 million new teachers.
  • Over 20 million college scholarships.
  • Health insurance for over 60 million children.
  • Or nearly 4 million new housing units.

    But no price tag can be put on the lost human lives.

    Our government hasn't wanted us to see the human cost of the war.

    It took grieving families and friends and veterans to create their own memorials like this one - crosses all in a row - on a California beach.

    The grieving continues online:

Mother (Sitting Near Headstone): He was my only child. This is something he gave me when he was 12 years old for Valentine's Day.

Sister: He wasn't just my brother. He was our father's best friend, he was our mother's baby boy.

Sister: My brother was a loving guy. A great brother, a great son, a great dad.

Mother: My angel was given to me on October 7, 1980. And he remains my angel to this day.

Bill Moyers: The number of soldiers killed has reached 3,372 this week.

Medic: We'll just got some oxygen on you, okay?

Bill Moyers: The number wounded - over 25,000 - And the number of limbs blown off and amputated - 1500 so far. And over five thousand head and brain injuries.

    And we can never reckon the unseen scars that last a lifetime.

    Sgt. Ty Ziegel suffered the loss of an eye, a fractured skull and burns over much of his body from the attack of a suicide bomber. Over 30 operations later he returned to civilian life and married his high school sweetheart, Renee.

    As he gets on with his life, his unit is going back for a third tour of duty - including his 21-year-old brother Zach.

    As for Iraqis, it's been difficult to get an accurate count of the dead and wounded.

    Estimates range up to three-quarters of a million killed.

    Caught in the cross-fire between Sunnis and Shiites, hunted down by death squads or cut down on their way to school work or the market, many just disappear into the debris.

    Some two million have fled the country running for their lives.

    Try to imagine what it's like to live with this.

    Try to imagine what it's like to live in this.

    Even when we catch a glimpse of their blackened bodies.

    Even when their stricken eyes stare back.

    They remain nameless to us - collateral damage - gone in a flash.

    Forty years ago, we escalated the war in Vietnam again and again despite the absence of a winning strategy.

    We're doing it again.

President George W. Bush: America will change our strategy to help the Iraqis carry out their campaign to put down sectarian violence - and bring security to the people of Baghdad. This will require increasing American force levels. So I have committed more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq.

Bill Moyers: The President is also calling up an additional 13,000 National Guardsmen next year despite the hardships on their families, communities and jobs. Nor will they be available during that time for emergency duty here at home. And the army has extended the tour of troops in Iraq to 15 months.

    As Democrats and Republicans in Washington wrangle over a strategy, there is speculation that no matter what agreement they reach ... American troops will be in Iraq at least a decade to come.

    We are not finished with the costs of this war.

    We'll be back next week. I'm Bill Moyers.

Source: Bill Moyers | The Cost of War

 

Sunday, May 13, 2007

VOTE in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll

 

On April 24, 2007, U.S. House Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced H.Res. 333, calling for articles of impeachment to be sent to the U.S Senate with regards to Vice President Richard B. Cheney.
If you believe that Vice President Cheney should be impeached, then vote "Yes" below.

The grounds of the proposed impeachment are that the Vice President:

  1. fabricated a threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction,
  2. purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress of the United States about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, and
  3. has threatened aggression against the Republic of Iran absent any real threat to the United States, all in detriment to the national interest of the United States.
The text of the resolution, the articles of impeachment, and all supporting references can be found at http://kucinich.house.gov/spotlightissues/documents.htm.
The one click form on this page will send your personal message to all your members of Congress, with your vote on the the question " Should Vice President Cheney be impeached?" At the same time it will send your personal comments only as a letter to the editor of your nearest local daily newspaper, if that option is selected below.

Source: VOTE in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll

 

The President's Poodle by Ann Telnaes



©2007 New York Times Syndicate



Source: Ann Telnaes, comics, editorial cartoons, email comics, political cartoons



Quote of the Day (May 13, 2007)

 

Quote of the Day (May 13, 2007)

Ninety-eight percent of the adults in this country are decent, hard-working, honest Americans. It's the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then--we elected them.
Lily Tomlin
Visit The Quotations Page for more quotes.

Source: ::uncomfortably numb::

 

Technorati tags: ,

Friday, May 11, 2007

Poll: Congress, Bush share low approval - Politics - MSNBC.com

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

WASHINGTON - People think the Democratic-led Congress is doing just as dreary a job as President Bush, following four months of bitter political standoffs that have seen little progress on Iraq and a host of domestic issues.

An AP-Ipsos poll also found that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is a more popular figure than the president and her colleagues on Capitol Hill, though she faces a gender gap in which significantly more women than men support her.

The survey found only 35 percent approve of how Congress is handling its job, down 5 percentage points in a month. That gives lawmakers the same bleak approval rating as Bush, who has been mired at about that level since last fall, including his dip to a record low for the AP-Ipsos poll of 32 percent last January.

"It's mostly Iraq" plus a lack of progress in other areas, said Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., who heads the House GOP's campaign committee. "These are not good numbers for an incumbent, and it doesn't matter if you have an 'R' or a 'D' next to your name."

  Click for related content

Iraq, gas prices and wrong track
Democrats agree that the problem is largely Iraq, which has dominated this year's session of Congress while producing little more than this month's Bush veto of a bill requiring the withdrawal of U.S. troops. It has also overshadowed House-passed bills on stem cell research, student loans and other subjects that the White House opposes, they say.

"People are unhappy, there hasn't been a lot of change in direction, for example in Iraq," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., chairman of House Democrats' campaign effort.

Rising gasoline prices could also be a factor, lawmakers said.

In another measure of popular discontent, the survey found that 71 percent say the country is on the wrong track - about even with the 73 percent who said so last May, the worst level since the AP-Ipsos poll began in December 2003.

The survey was taken Monday through Wednesday, before Bush offered to seek compromise with congressional Democrats over a war spending bill setting benchmarks for progress in Iraq.

Bush told reporters Thursday that if pollsters had asked his opinion about Iraq last fall, "I'd have said I disapprove of what was going on in Iraq. They could have put me down as part of the disapproval process."

That was before his decision to send nearly 30,000 additional troops to Iraq, which "would more likely cause me to approve of what's going on in Iraq," he added.

(Click on Souce link below to read the entire article)

Source: Poll: Congress, Bush share low approval - Politics - MSNBC.com

 

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

We've Been Hit!

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


By Mike Luckovich , Atlanta Journal-Constitution
From the Cartoonist Group.

Source: We've Been Hit!

 

Join Meg Ryan and take action for mothers


Dear Friends,

Motherhood and pregnancy should be a time of great joy, but in
the poorest parts of the world, motherhood can be deadly.
In some countries, women have a 1 in 6 chance of dying
from pregnancy-related complications, compared to as little
as 1 in 30,000 in northern Europe.

We know what works. A comprehensive investment can save
countless lives and help millions of women build a better
future for themselves and for their families. Please join
Meg Ryan in urging Congress to support
CARE's Safe Motherhood Platform today.
Bob Fertik

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Dear Friend,

Every minute of every day, one woman dies from
pregnancy-related complications. Every minute. But
it will only take you a minute to help change this
heartbreaking statistic forever.

As a mother of two children, I am personally moved
to help women and mothers worldwide - that is just
one of the reasons I have become so involved with
CARE.
I believe, like I'm sure you do, that in today's world
it is unacceptable for mothers to die from simple
pregnancy-related complications - like lack of hygienic
medical instruments, lack of access to modern
contraception, or the absence of trained and
knowledgeable birth attendants.

But there is hope. Ordinary people like you and me have
the chance to make a tremendous difference for mothers
and their children worldwide.

A bill is being debated in Congress right now that could
help save up to 142,000 mothers and up to 1.4 million
infants world wide. Before one more woman dies, urge your
representative to support the Focus on Family Health bill.

This legislation will increase funding for international
family planning and maternal health programs carried out by
the
United States Agency for International Development(USAID).
Its passage could have a tremendous positive impact on the
health of countless mothers. Please take a minute for mothers
and contact your representative now.

When a mother dies, the loss affects more than just her family.
A woman's death affects her entire community, which loses a
vital caregiver, educator and resource in the journey out of poverty.

Together with CARE,
we can all make a difference today to
help by contacting your representative today.

Sincerely,
Meg Ryan


Friday, May 4, 2007

Tell Congress to Impeach Cheney First | Democrats.com

 

Tell Congress to Impeach Cheney First

I urge you to co-sponsor Rep. Dennis Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment, H.Res. 333, which read:

In his conduct while Vice President of the United States, Richard B. Cheney, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of Vice President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has

1. purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress of the United States by fabricating a threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to justify the use of the United States Armed Forces against the nation of Iraq in a manner damaging to our national security interests

2. purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress of the United States about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda in order to justify the use of the United States Armed Forces against the nation of Iraq in a manner damaging to our national security interests

3. openly threatened aggression against the Republic of Iran absent any real threat to the United States, and done so with the United States proven capability to carry out such threats, thus undermining the national security of the United States

Wherefore Richard B. Cheney, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

(Click on the source link below to sign the petition)

Source: Tell Congress to Impeach Cheney First | Democrats.com

"The President Has Effectively Gone AWOL"

 

George Bush, the most ideologically-driven and politically calculating president in American history, wants Americans to believe that he has suddenly discovered a moral high ground from which to make grand declarations about who he must maintain the occupation of Iraq.

After vetoing legislation Tuesday that gave him the money to continue his war but required that he accept loose limits of its ultimate duration, the president told the nation, "I recognize that many Democrats saw this bill as an opportunity to make a political statement about their opposition to the war. They sent their message, and now it is time to put politics behind us and support our troops with the funds they need."

Bush has made his position clear: Democrats, many of whom rightly argued four years ago that going to war in Iraq would be the huge mistake it has turned out to be, and who have since been far ahead of the White House in identifying the nature of the crisis that has since developed, are now to be dismissed as the players of political games when they advocate for a strategy that would begin bringing US troops home from the conflict on a schedule beginning October 1.

That's a remarkable line of analysis from a president whose inability to recognize the flaws in his own neo-conservative vision has rendered his wrong at every turn, and whose determination to play politics with life-and-death decisions has defined not just his approach to the Iraq war but his tenure as president.

Yet Bush is not giving up on his faith that he can frame the argument about Iraq as a fight between Congressional Democrats who are out to score political points and a presidential administration that is motivated merely by a desire to respond appropriately to practical realities on the ground in Iraq.

"Twelve weeks ago, I asked the Congress to pass an emergency war spending bill that would provide our brave men and women in uniform with the funds and flexibility they need," said Bush in framing his veto message. "Instead, members of the House and the Senate passed a bill that substitutes the opinions of politicians for the judgment of our military commanders."

The problem with Bush's "I'm-so-above-politics" line is that he has been disregarding advice from military commanders since before the war began.

Consider the response to his veto from top military men who commanded troops in Iraq.

"The President vetoed our troops and the American people," says retired Maj. Gen. John Batiste. "His stubborn commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq is incomprehensible. He committed our great military to a failed strategy in violation of basic principles of war. His failure to mobilize the nation to defeat world wide Islamic extremism is tragic. We deserve more from our commander-in-chief and his administration."

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton: "This administration and the previously Republican-controlled legislature have been the most caustic agents against America's Armed Forces in memory. Less than a year ago, the Republicans imposed great hardship on the Army and Marine Corps by their failure to pass a necessary funding language. This time, the President of the United States is holding our Soldiers hostage to his ego. More than ever [it is] apparent [that] only the Army and the Marine Corps are at war -- alone, without their President's support."

Retired military commanders associated with the Washington-based National Security Network have been blunt about their sense that Bush is not just wrong about Iraq but that he is failing the troops he purports to support.

Some make historical comparisons.

Says retired Lt. Gen. Robert Gard: "With this veto, the president has doomed us to repeating a terrible history. President Bush's current position is hauntingly reminiscent of March 1968 in Vietnam. At that time, both the Secretary of Defense and the President had recognized that the war could not be won militarily--just as our military commanders in Iraq have acknowledged. But not wanting to be tainted with losing a war, President Johnson authorized a surge of 25,000 troops. At that point, there had been 24,000 U.S. troops killed in action. Five years later, when the withdrawal of US troops was complete, we had suffered 34,000 additional combat deaths.

Others offer a straightforward assessment of Bush's failure as the commander-in-chief. "By vetoing this bill and failing to initiate an immediate and phased withdrawal, the President has effectively gone AWOL, deserting his duty post, leaving American forces with an impossible mission, suffering wholly unnecessary casualties," argues retired Lt. Gen. William E. Odom.

Add the public statements of the retired generals together with the behind-the-scenes expressions of frustration from current commanders and they form the most powerful tool that Congressional Democrats have in what will ultimately be a negotiation not with Bush but with the American people--a negotiation that, the president well understands, is about the question of which side is playing politics and which side is listening to military commanders and supporting the troops.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should take the message of these retired generals--along with the anti-war statements of thousands of current and returned Iraq soldiers --into the fight with Bush. And, to borrow a slightly impolitic phrase from Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair Joe Biden, they should "shove it down his throat."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

John Nichols' new book is THE GENIUS OF IMPEACHMENT: The Founders' Cure for Royalism. Rolling Stone's Tim Dickinson hails it as a "nervy, acerbic, passionately argued history-cum-polemic [that] combines a rich examination of the parliamentary roots and past use of the 'heroic medicine' that is impeachment with a call for Democratic leaders to 'reclaim and reuse the most vital tool handed to us by the founders for the defense of our most basic liberties.'"

Source: "The President Has Effectively Gone AWOL"

 

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Prescription For Chaos and Confusion

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Source: Ann Telnaes, comics, editorial cartoons, email comics, political cartoons

Restore Habeas Corpus

What is habeas corpus?

Habeas corpus, or the Great Writ, is the legal procedure that keeps the government from holding you indefinitely without showing cause. When you challenge your detention by filing a habeas corpus petition, the executive branch must explain to a neutral judge its justification for holding you. It’s been a pillar of Western law since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215.

Habeas corpus has been a right in America from the time the first settlers came to our shores. The Founders of our nation thought habeas corpus was so essential to preserving liberty, justice and democracy that they enshrined it in the very first article of the United States Constitution.

What happened to habeas corpus?

In its waning days, the last Congress passed the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2006. Among many ill-considered and dangerous provisions, the MCA revoked the right to habeas corpus for anyone detained at Guantanamo Bay, as well as for any foreigner the government detains anywhere and labels an “enemy combatant,” including legal residents of the U.S.

Why must habeas corpus be restored?

The Founders of our nation considered habeas corpus the most fundamental of rights because it insured that the executive branch could not hold people without cause. A vast majority of the detainees at Guantanamo are there by mistake, guilty only of being sold to the U.S. for a bounty. When our government revokes the right to habeas corpus it shows other governments they can do the same and puts U.S. citizens traveling and working abroad at risk. If we do not defend the detainees’ right to habeas corpus, and the rights of our neighbors, family and friends who are not yet citizens, we all lose.

(Click on link below to find out how you can help restore habeas corpus)

Link to www.restorehabeascorpus.org

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

ANSWER condemns LAPD attack on immigrant rights movement

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

On May 1, tens of thousands of protesters participated in mass marches for immigrant rights in Los Angeles and around the United States. The march targeted by the LAPD was the second major action in the city that day. It marched from Vermont and 3rd to MacArthur Park.

By all accounts, the march was peaceful—that is, until the cops began their coordinated attack on the participants.

Soon after the thousands of marchers arrived at MacArthur Park, a police motorcade forced its way into a large circle of people who were enjoying the Aztec Dancers perform an Indigenous ceremony in Alvarado St. near the Southeast corner of the park. The cops pushed people, including Aztec Dancers and children, to the ground.

Next, cops on bicycles rushed through the crowd demanding people evacuate the area. They were followed closely by LAPD “shock troops” on foot, who forced people from the area by hitting onlookers with batons.

The crowd was obviously upset and highly concerned by the unprovoked and violent police attack. In an attempt to defend themselves, people responded by hurling empty water bottles and fruit at the police.

Contrary to LAPD Chief Bratton’s statement that their violence was in response to “certain elements of the crowd … [who] began to create a series of disturbances," it was really the other way around.

As this was happening at the east corner of the park, several hundred yards away on the other end of the park, dozens of cops in full riot gear cleared the street by pushing people onto the sidewalks.

The coordinated, military-style actions show a deliberate calculus used by the LAPD. This was a premeditated attack—a police riot. It is standard practice to repress mass movements and working people.

‘They were merciless’

The worst was yet to come. Less than one hour after the initial attack, the LAPD began its full assault on the marchers and all people in the park. Well over 100 riot cops, including 30 to 40 shooting pellet guns and rubber-coated bullets began attacking everyone in the park. They fired many times directly at people, many of whom could not get away from the police onslaught. Police also shot tear gas at the protesters.

One eyewitness to the LAPD violence was Ernesto Arce, ANSWER Coalition organizer and KPFK radio host. Arce, who was hit in the leg with a rubber-coated bullet during the attack, described the scene:

“Without warning, cops descended into a park full of families, homeless and handicapped individuals and street cart vendors. They were merciless.

“For the next 30 minutes, hundreds of activists and bystanders were shot, beaten by night sticks and run out of the park. The police had no intention of entertaining requests from people who were not able to move quickly enough. They were forcefully hit on the legs until they were immobile.

“The cops didn't only move people out of the perimeters of the park, they chased through the park firing at anyone who might have been an obstacle. I witnessed many people who were shot at from the back. Children and entire families were being violently pushed or beaten. An elderly woman cried out for help but few were willing to run back in the face of fast-approaching SWAT police.

“We were chased onto 7th street and forced at least 6 blocks west. The police tried to cordon off the entire area, but most protestors didn't stick around. It was frightening for even seasoned protestors.”

The cops shut down the organized rally. Many scheduled speakers did not get to speak. In addition, they overturned and destroyed the tables and displays of non-profits inside Macarthur Park. The LAPD claimed that they declared the legally permitted event an “unlawful assembly.” But no one heard an official order to disperse or face arrest. In fact, a Fox News reporter heard riot cops say, “Better hustle, it’s time to tussle,” as they moved in on people with batons and loaded weapons.

(Read the entire story at ANSWER by clicking the source link below)

Take action today

Write an e-mail or contact Mayor Villaraigosa to express your outrage at the attack on immigrant rights marchers and community members.

ANSWER has set up an easy-to-use mechanism to fax or write a letter to the Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa demanding that Bratton be fired immediately and that his application for reappointment be denied. Click this link to send your letter by fax or email.

Source: Act Now to Stop War & End Racism (ANSWER): ANSWER condemns LAPD attack on immigrant rights movement

"Veto Accomplished" by Mark Fiore

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Link to Veto Accomplished 5/2/07